Presentation Schedule


Presenter Registration Banner 5

Argumentation in Initial Teacher Education: University Instructors’ Explanations (105013)

Session Information: Higher Education
Session Chair: Yahya Alharbi

Saturday, 11 July 2026 16:05
Session: Session 5
Room: UCL Torrington, G10 (Ground Floor)
Presentation Type:Oral Presentation

All presentation times are UTC + 1 (Europe/London)

In the current post-truth context—marked by misinformation and eroded trust in scientific knowledge (Towler, 2025)—higher education must prepare future teachers capable of critical thinking (Puig et al., 2023). Although critical thinking is recognized as a key learning outcome (Bellaera et al., 2021), its development is complex (Darcie et al., 2024). Argumentation is a central pathway to foster it (Aarar & Pérez, 2025), yet its systematic integration into initial teacher education is limited, partly due to transmissive teaching approaches that restrict opportunities for argumentative dialogue (Borge et al., 2020). Little is known about how teacher educators’ subjective theories contribute to this gap. This study aims to reconstruct the subjective theories held by teacher educators regarding argumentative skills and practices in initial teacher education. A qualitative grounded theory study was conducted with 15 university instructors at a Chilean public university. Data were generated through interviews and analysed using grounded theory coding. The findings show strong consensus regarding the educational, civic relevance of argumentation, alongside a perception of limited argumentative proficiency among students. Instructors’ explanations cluster into three domains: (a) macro sociocultural factors, such as conflict avoidance and inequalities in students’ cultural capital; (b) institutional and curricular conditions, including the absence of argumentation in learning outcomes and predominance of expository teaching; and (c) emotional and power dynamics in the classroom, linked to fear of exposure, assessment, and asymmetries between instructors and students. A theoretical model is proposed and implications for formative interventions to integrate argumentation into teacher education curricula are discussed.

Authors:
Ingrid González-Palta, Universidad de La Serena, Chile
Pablo Castro, Universidad de La Serena, Chile


About the Presenter(s)
Mr Ingrid González-Palta is a University Doctoral Student at Universidad Alberto Hurtado in Chile

See this presentation on the full scheduleSaturday Schedule



Conference Comments & Feedback

Place a comment using your LinkedIn profile

Comments

Share on activity feed

Powered by WP LinkPress

Share this Presentation

Posted by James Alexander Gordon

Last updated: 2023-02-23 23:45:00